<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agents From First Principles on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/categories/agents-from-first-principles/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agents From First Principles on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/categories/agents-from-first-principles/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Advanced Agents From First Principles 07: Do Your Agents Agree Too Easily? Use Adversarial Review and Multi-Agent Debate Without Confusing Debate With Truth</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/post/advanced-agents-from-first-principles-07/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/post/advanced-agents-from-first-principles-07/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A multi-agent system can look sophisticated while every agent quietly repeats the same mistake.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That is one of the most dangerous failure modes in advanced agent architectures.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;You ask one model to solve the problem.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Then you ask a second model to review it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Then a third model judges the disagreement.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Three calls later, the system sounds more confident than before.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But if all three agents share the same blind spot, the extra machinery has not created independent evidence.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
