<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ablation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/ablation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ablation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:00:23 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/ablation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Did the Context Help?</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/context/23-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 05:00:23 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/context/23-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The staged compiler passed every test its contract set. Forty-two fixture-budget combinations, forty-two correct success-or-failure verdicts, zero illegal admissions of any class, required-item recall at 1.0 on every feasible combination. And the same frozen run admits five distractors and two evaluator-labelled harmful items into staged bundles — information the hidden ledger marks as useless or worse, sitting inside policy-valid, budget-compliant, fully traced context. Nothing malfunctioned. The compiler cannot see hidden labels, and legality never promised usefulness. So here is the question the previous chapter earned but could not answer: the bundle is legal, but did it help?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
