<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agent Evaluation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/agent-evaluation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Agent Evaluation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 15:54:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/agent-evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Agents From First Principles 02: AI Agent Gives Inconsistent Answers? Generate Multiple Candidates and Rank Them</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/post/agents-from-first-principles-02/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 15:54:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/post/agents-from-first-principles-02/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the first things you notice when you build anything around a large language model is that the same prompt does not always produce the same quality of answer.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes the first response is excellent.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it is merely acceptable.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Sometimes it misses the point entirely.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That creates a very common agent-engineering question:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If the model is inconsistent, should the agent trust the first answer it gets?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Often, no.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
