<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Boundaries on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/boundaries/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Boundaries on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/boundaries/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>09: Is There Actually One Thing Here?</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/digital-life/09-is-there-actually-one-thing-here/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/digital-life/09-is-there-actually-one-thing-here/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The last chapter ended with a suspicion about a word.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We have been saying &lt;em&gt;the crystal&lt;/em&gt; since Chapter 4, and the noun has been doing quiet work ever since. We kept using it after material became impermanent. We kept using it after large material turnover appeared beneath the visible state. We kept using it after computational opportunity was shown to strongly constrain its scale, and after no tested budget produced a stationary population.&#xA;Through all of that, the sentence &amp;ldquo;the crystal is doing X&amp;rdquo; kept seeming like a sentence about something.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
