<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Delegation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/delegation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Delegation on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:20 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/delegation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Capability Is Not Authority</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/20-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:20 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/20-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 4 — Make It Safe and Verifiable&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;a-sensible-correction-refused&#34;&gt;A sensible correction, refused&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Constructed scene.&lt;/strong&gt; A reviewer finds an incorrect cache setting and proposes the right replacement. Its worker can edit files. The person who opened the review asked for inspection only.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The correction&amp;rsquo;s quality is beside the point. An accurate proposal grants no permission to apply it. The presence of an editing tool grants none either.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Chapter 19 separated the actor&amp;rsquo;s report from evidence about the effect. Now move back to the moment before that effect: the process is about to call a worker that can change something. Which part of the system decides whether it may?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
