<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Hexagonal Lattice on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/hexagonal-lattice/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Hexagonal Lattice on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/hexagonal-lattice/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>04: The Digital Crystal</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/digital-life/04-the-digital-crystal/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/digital-life/04-the-digital-crystal/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Outlier was the wrong laboratory for the question we now wanted to ask.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Not a wrong system. The last two chapters were worth every page, and nothing in them is retracted. Outlier showed us what computation can support.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;But by the end of the flocking investigation, another problem had become unmistakable: it was much better at producing phenomena than at isolating them.&#xA;Geometry, ancestry, distance, expansion, local environment and interaction all arrive together in that world, arising from the same 512 bits, moving together, entangled beyond separation. Every control we built was an attempt to statistically undo an entanglement we could not experimentally prevent, and one entire regime stayed unresolved because the comparison we needed simply did not exist in the data.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
