<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ladders on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/ladders/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Ladders on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:28 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/ladders/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What Should Happen Next?</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/28-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:28 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/28-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 6 — Put Intelligence Into the Process&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;a-claim-awaiting-a-check&#34;&gt;A claim awaiting a check&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Constructed scene.&lt;/strong&gt; A patch sits open with one review comment unresolved: a retry test that may or may not cover the new branch. Three things could happen next. A model could propose a fix. A deterministic check could run the test suite. A person could be asked whether the branch matters at all. Each costs something different, fails differently, and answers a different question. &amp;ldquo;Try a stronger model&amp;rdquo; is not on that list until something has established that generation is the missing operation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
