<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Open Loops on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/open-loops/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Open Loops on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/open-loops/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What Did We Leave Unfinished?</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/memory/09-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:09 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/memory/09-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Chapter 8 closed the first half with a system that maintains belief through time. That system is a good historian. This chapter shows it is a poor colleague. A historian answers questions about the past. A colleague knows what the past left undone — and the system as built so far cannot tell a closed chapter from an open obligation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-migration-is-finished-the-work-is-not&#34;&gt;The migration is finished. The work is not.&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Extend the running migration history past the July decision:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consequences Nobody Wrote Down</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/memory/11-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:11 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/memory/11-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Chapter 9 handles work the history states: promises, assignments, follow-ups with an established expectation behind them. This chapter pushes Question 5 past conventional task tracking, to consequences nobody wrote down. The migration broke assumptions encoded in fixtures, documentation, and configuration that no session mentions. A memory that tracks only stated intentions will report the open list as empty while the project quietly rots. Whether anything can be done about that — reliably, without inventing obligations — is treated here as a difficult hypothesis, not a capability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
