<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasoning Agents on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/reasoning-agents/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Reasoning Agents on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 23:37:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/reasoning-agents/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Advanced Agents From First Principles 04: Does Your Agent Prune Good Ideas Too Early? Use Monte Carlo Tree Search for Long-Horizon Reasoning</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/post/advanced-agents-from-first-principles-04/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 23:37:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/post/advanced-agents-from-first-principles-04/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A common failure in search-based agents is easy to miss.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The agent generates several plausible branches.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It scores them.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;One branch looks weak.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So the runtime prunes it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Later, you discover that the discarded branch was the only one that could have reached the correct solution.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem was not generation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem was not necessarily the model.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The problem was &lt;strong&gt;search allocation&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The agent spent too much compute exploiting what looked good early and too little compute exploring alternatives whose value only became visible later.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
