<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Statistics on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</title>
    <link>http://programmer.ie/tags/statistics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Statistics on Programmer.ie: Modern AI programming</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="http://programmer.ie/tags/statistics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Intelligence in the Wrong Direction</title>
      <link>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/07-chapter/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 05:00:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>http://programmer.ie/books/applied-ai/07-chapter/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Part 1 — Where You Stand&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-thing-the-marketing-does-not-cover&#34;&gt;The thing the marketing does not cover&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Every vendor will sell you more capability. None of them can sell you direction.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A more capable model pointed at the wrong objective does not produce less wrong work. It produces &lt;em&gt;better-executed&lt;/em&gt; wrong work at greater volume, wrapped in more convincing prose. The gap between what you wanted and what you got does not shrink with capability. Frequently it widens, because a weaker model&amp;rsquo;s output was obviously off and a stronger model&amp;rsquo;s output is plausibly off.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
